Research Template

UniLOA Administration

Planning Template

The Barratt-Frederick University Learning Outcomes Assessment (UniLOA) is designed for use by higher education institutions and measures students’ behaviors along seven areas considered to be critical in holistic growth, learning, and development.  Those seven areas include critical thinking, self awareness, communication, diversity, citizenship, membership and leadership, and relationships.
 

This template is provided to assist institutions of higher education in the planning for and administration of a program of assessing student learning outcomes.  The specific protocol adopted by an institution should be one that provides data that can be used to inform planning for the future. 

 

1)     Be clear about what outcomes will be measured.

The UniLOA eases this step by measuring seven domains of common interest that represent holistic learning and as such, serves as a stand-alone assessment platform.  However, some institutions may have an interest in collecting information in addition to the UniLOA itself.  Institutions are free to add additional items to the basic 70-item instrument, but in order to preserve the integrity of the nationwide UniLOA database, participating institutions are asked to administer all existing demographics questions from the UniLOA as well.  Locally-added question results will not be stored in the UniLOA National Database. 

2)     Design a protocol for your methodology, including:

Participants:  To fully exploit the power of the UniLOA to inform an institution of the efficacy of its programs, it is recommended that all students complete the instrument on a yearly basis at the end of each academic year.  Administering the UniLOA to the entire population of students allows a full understanding of student learning outcomes at the unit, school, division and institutional levels.  Some institutions may find that administering the UniLOA to all students is not warranted, and in lieu of such an approach, a random sampling may allow sufficient information from which conclusions might be drawn.  Use of convenience samples is not recommended as that approach would degrade the quality of the data collected. 

Recruitment:  Recruiting volunteer participants creates some challenges in that those participants alone may not accurately reflect the student population’s mean.  However, since large group results typically regress to the mean, a large number of participants is desirable.  It is likely that students will not see a value-added quality to their participation, so the venue of administration will impact the total number of participants.

 Location of Study:  Because the most common point of contact for students is through their classroom attendance, it is strongly recommended that the UniLOA be administered during regular class meetings.  The UniLOA can be completed in an average of 20 minutes, so the time taken during a regular class meeting is minimal.

 3)     Data Collection: 

     The UniLOA can be completed through hard-copy or electronic formats.  Electronic methods of data capture has has been shown to be no different in reliability from hard-copy, but response rates can be somewhat lower.

      Depending upon the institution’s desire to use the information collected, approval for the investigation might be required by the local Human Subjects Institutional Review Board, especially due to the collection of information that might easily be linked to a specific participant.  Please contact your HSIRB after you have designed your protocol for guidance as to whether a review will be required or not.

     The UniLOA User’s Agreement must be submitted to the authors, which clearly outline procedures to be followed in the sharing of your institution’s results.  Your institution’s raw data, minus any identifying information (i.e., name, identification number) must be submitted to the UniLOA National Database for purposes of dynamic norming.  A standard report form is used to report results back to the institution but special reports can be generated at the institution's request at no additional charge.

 

 Prior to and during the planning and administration phase of the investigation, close communication with the authors will minimize any confusion and will maximize the potential for discovery.  The authors can be contacted at:

 

Will Barratt, Ph.D.

CE 1206

Indiana State University

Terre Haute, IN 7803

willbarratt@indstate.edu

812-237-2869

 

Mark Frederick, Ph.D.

PH 205

Indiana State University

Terre Haute, IN 47803

mfrederick@indstate.edu

812-237-3888